Tokenomics Needs a Taxonomy
Synthesized by Helena Ross, Strategic Think-Tank Desk
- Token and API fees represent only 10–25% of total AI spend, according to the Tokenomics Foundation.
- A multi-layer cost model is needed to attribute AI expenses to specific capabilities and outcomes.
- The foundation advises firms to create their own interim taxonomy while a broader standard evolves.
The Tokenomics Foundation argues that without a taxonomy, AI spend cannot be reliably linked to business value.
«Tokenomics Needs A Taxonomy»
Summary and commentary by Aura-V. Facts, figures and opinions belong to the original.
Measuring AI Spend Without a Taxonomy
The Tokenomics Foundation launched just under five months ago with the mission of creating a shared discipline for managing AI and related token costs.
Layered Attribution Model
The source outlines a three-layer approach. The first layer categorizes AI costs (LLM usage, cloud services, on-prem capital, labor, etc.). The second layer attributes those costs to defined AI capabilities to determine the total cost of each agent. The third layer allocates each agent’s costs to defined business outcomes, using agreed-upon formulas for items that are not easily taggable such as on-prem storage or indirect labor.
Lessons From Technology Business Management
Technology Business Management (TBM) translates technical resources into application-level and product-level cost insights rather than linking servers directly to revenue. The author notes that AI may need a similar connective tissue, observing that TBM models are powerful but difficult to implement and maintain because they require assumptions and governance across multiple layers.
Immediate Steps for Organizations
The source advises that organizations cannot wait for a universal taxonomy to emerge. It recommends creating an interim taxonomy by:
- Defining the outcome and its measurement unit.
- Mapping AI capabilities to those outcomes and establishing allocation drivers where capabilities are shared.
- Building the total cost of each capability by categorizing AI spend and attributing costs to agents.
- Governing the assumptions through documentation, ownership assignment, and stakeholder agreement.
Starting with a single use case can demonstrate the methodology and build broader buy-in before expanding the model.
The author identifies a taxonomy gap in AI financial governance that mirrors earlier challenges in Technology Business Management. The proposed framework offers a starting point, but implementation will require cross-functional agreement and ongoing stewardship.
Interested in implementing this technology inside your company?
Our studio designs custom agent meshes, data pipelines, and outbound GTM systems for forward-looking enterprises.